Outcomes of Clostridioides difficile Infection in Patients With Liver Cirrhosis: A Nationwide Study.

BACKGROUND: Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is a major health problem that has been on the rise for the last couple of decades. It has significant mortality and morbidity in hospitalized patients. We looked at the outcomes of CDI in patients with liver cirrhosis compared to those without liver cirrhosis. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study from a large inpatient database. The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) was queried for CDI admissions between January 2012 and September 2015. Patients admitted with CDI were identified using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes. The outcomes included overall mortality, length of hospitalization, and healthcare expenditure related to hospitalization. RESULTS: Out of all patients, 53,765 (3.97%) had concurrent CDI and liver cirrhosis. Diabetes mellitus, alcohol abuse, and acquired immunodeficiency were observed more in patients with liver cirrhosis. Overall mortality (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.65, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.53 - 1.77, P < 0.001), cost of hospitalization and length of hospital stay (11.0 vs. 10.4 days, P < 0.001) were significantly higher in patients with cirrhosis. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CDI and liver cirrhosis have significantly higher mortality, prolonged hospitalization and healthcare expenditure. Further studies are recommended to look at reversible risk factors for CDI in patients with liver cirrhosis to guide quality measures that would ultimately improve outcomes.

A Rare Presentation of Drug-induced Liver Injury with Fluticasone and Vilanterol Inhaler Use.

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a rare and potentially lethal condition associated with the use of many commonly-used medications, including inhaled fluticasone-vilanterol. Therefore, a careful review of medications should always be obtained in the setting of acute onset hepatic dysfunction. We present the first reported case of idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury associated with the use of this medication.

Randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial evaluating simethicone pretreatment with bowel preparation during colonoscopy.

BACKGROUND: The presence of small air bubbles and foam are an impediment to a successful colonoscopy. They impair an endoscopist's view and diminish the diagnostic accuracy of the study. This has been particularly noted to be of concern with the switch to lower volume polyethylene glycol (PEG) and bisacodyl combination preparation. AIM: To evaluate the effect of oral simethicone addition to bowel preparation on intraluminal bubbles reduction during colonoscopy. METHODS: Described is a prospective, randomized, multi-center, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the use of premixed simethicone formulation with split-regimen, low-volume PEG-bisacodyl combination bowel preparation for 168 outpatients undergoing screening, surveillance, and diagnostic colonoscopies. Primary outcome includes evaluation of bubbles during colonoscopy graded using the Intraluminal Bubbles Scale. Secondary outcomes include evaluation of the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS), total number of polyps, polyp size differentiation, polyp laterality, adenoma detection, mass detection, cecal insertion time, withdrawal time, and patient-reported adverse events. RESULTS: Higher Intraluminal Bubbles grades III and IV (less than 75% of the mucosa cleared of bubbles/foam requiring intervention with simethicone infused wash) were detected in the placebo group [Simethicone n = 4/84 vs Placebo n = 20/84 (P = 0.007)]. BBPS total score was 7.42 [standard deviation (SD) = ± 1.51] in the simethicone group and 7.28 (SD = ± 1.44) in the placebo group (P = 0.542) from a total of 9. Significantly higher number of adenomas were detected in the simethicone group (P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: The addition of simethicone to bowel preparation is well advised for its anti-foaming properties. The results of this study suggest that addition of oral simethicone can improve bowel wall visibility.

Racial Disparity in Incidence and Survival for Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GISTs): an Analysis of SEER Database.

BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal tumors (GISTs) represent the most common mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. There has been limited data on GIST incidence and survival disparities between ethnic groups. AIMS: Assess disparities in incidence and survival among race in the USA in the era of available GIST histologic codes and treatment. METHODS: We queried Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database for GIST from 2002 to 2015, with diagnostic code 8936. RESULTS: Of the 7204 patients identified, 4928 (68.4%) were White, 1308 (18.2%) African American (AA), and 968 (13.4%) were classified as "Other" (American Indian/Alaskan Native, Asian/Pacific Islander). The overall incidence rate (IR) was 0.75 per 100,000. IR was highest among AA at 1.37/100,000, but 0.65/100,000 for Whites, 1.10/100,000 for Asians/Pacific Islanders, and 0.28/100,000 for American Indians/Alaskan Natives. The GIST incidence was twice as high for AA as for Whites (rate ratio [RR]: 2.12; 95% CI: 1.98-2.26; p < 0.001). There was higher proportion of Whites than AA, who underwent surgical extirpation. Median overall survival (OS) and GIST specific survival (GSS) were not reached for all race, which indicates more than half of the patients were still alive at end of follow-up period. In multivariate Cox model, belonging to "Other" had better OS (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]; 0.73, 95% CI: 0.55-0.95, P = 0.021) for GIST, but no difference in prognosis and OS for AA and White [(aHR for whites; 0.84, 95% CI: 0.69-1.02, P = 0.071), AA = reference]. There was no difference in GSS among races. CONCLUSIONS: Significant racial disparity in incidence and overall survival for GIST exists, and efforts should be made to bridge this gap and improve outcomes for all races. The overall incidence rate for GIST was noted to be 7.5 per 1 million, and IR of GIST was twice as high for African Americans as compared to Whites. The "Other" racial group (American Indians/Alaskan Natives, Asians, and Pacific Islanders) had superior OS as compared to African Americans and Whites.

Influence of race and geographic setting on the management of gastric adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Conflicting evidence indicates that both race and geographic setting may influence the management of malignancies such as gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC). METHODS: We designed a retrospective cohort study utilizing data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program to identify patients with resectable GAC (N = 15 991). Exposures of interest were race and geographic region of diagnosis (West [WE], Midwest [MW], South [SO], or Northeast [NE]). Endpoints included: (1) recommendation against surgery and (2) gastric adenocarcinoma-specific survival (GACSS). Multivariable logistic and Cox regression models were used to identify pertinent associations. RESULTS: A total of 15 991 patients were included (2007-2015). In adjusted analysis, African American individuals more frequently received a recommendation against surgical resection than White (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.86; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76-0.98), Asian American (aOR = 0.55; 95% CI, 0.46-0.65), and American Indian (aOR = 0.50; 95% CI, 0.31-0.82) individuals. In addition to race-based discrepancies, there was a significant association between geography and management: individuals diagnosed with GAC in the SO were more likely to receive a recommendation against surgery (odds ratio = 1.35; 95% CI, 1.23-1.49) and exhibited poorer GACSS as compared with those in the WE, MW, or NE regions. CONCLUSIONS: Race and geographic region of diagnosis affect treatment recommendations and GACSS among individuals with resectable tumors. African Americans with resectable cancers are more likely to receive a recommendation against surgery than individuals of other racial groups.

Colon Cancer Sidedness, Presentation, and Survival at Different Stages.

BACKGROUND: Several prognostic factors have been used to guide therapy for colon cancer (CC). However, the relationship between CC laterality (sidedness) and prognosis remains under investigation. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect of laterality on CC presentation and survival, using a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) population-based cohort. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study using data from the SEER program (2007-2015). RESULTS: Of the 163,980 patients with CC, 85,779 (52.3%) presented with right-sided CC (RCC) and 78,201 (47.7%) with left-sided CC (LCC). Stage distributions were as follows: stage I, 24.1%; stage II, 27.3%; stage III, 28.2%; and stage IV, 20.4%. In an adjusted modified Poisson regression approach for risk ratio (RR), patients with LCCs were more likely to be male (RR = 1.14; 95% CI 1.12-1.15, p<0.001). As compared to stage I, stage II cancers (RR = 0.88, 95% CI 0.87-0.90, p<0.001) were less likely to be LCC. Stage IV CC was slightly less likely to be left-sided (RR = 0.98, 95% CI 0.98, 0.96-1.00, p = 0.028). The median overall survival (OS) for RCC was 87 months. The median OS for LCC was not established, as more than half of the patients diagnosed with LCC were still living at the time of the analysis. In adjusted Cox proportional Hazard model, individuals with stage I, III, and IV LCCs had superior OS as compared to those with matched-stage RCC (adjusted HR = 0.87; 95% CI 0.85-0.88, p<0.001). However, OS was worse among those with stage II disease who presented with LCC (adjusted Hazard ratio [aHR] = 1.06; 95% CI 1.02-1.11, p = 0.004). CC-specific survival (CSS) was superior for LCC versus RCC for stages III and IV but worse for II. CONCLUSIONS: In this population-cohort study, LCC is associated with superior OS and CSS survival. The overall survival advantage was attributed to stage I, III, and IV disease. Individuals presenting with stage II disease exhibit superior survival if the CC is right-sided.

Colorectal Cancer Presentation and Survival in Young Individuals: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Emerging evidence suggests that the incidence of colorectal cancer is increasing among individuals under the age of 50 years. However, the pattern of disease presentation in young patients remains under investigation. This is a retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer (CRC) between 2004 and 2015. Data was acquired from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results 18 program registries. A total of 269,398 patients who met the inclusion criteria were included in the final analysis. The primary outcomes were the likelihood of metastatic disease at diagnosis and survival. Of the 269,389 patients diagnosed with CRC, 11.8% of the patients were young (20 to 49 years), 45.6% were middle-aged (50 to 69 years), and 42.6% were elderly (70 years or older). Individuals in the middle-aged and elderly cohorts were significantly less likely to present with metastatic disease as compared to the young cohort (middle-aged adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 0.73, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.70 to 0.75, elderly aOR = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.47 to 0.50). However, overall survival was longest in the young cohort. We conclude that young individuals with colorectal cancer have an increased risk of presenting with distant metastases as compared to the middle-aged and elderly, but, nevertheless, exhibit prolonged survival.

A peculiar case of asymptomatic spontaneous pneumomediastinum.

OBJECTIVE: To present a case of asymptomatic spontaneous pneumomediastinum and review available evidence-based workup and management. CASE PRESENTATION: A young Caucasian adult male with a history of inhalational drug use was admitted to the internal medicine service for evaluation of dehydration and mild rhabdomyolysis. Patient had been on the run from the police and had spent the last days prior to presentation without food, water, or shelter. On admission, patient had no complaints, except for thirst. It was detected on physical exam and chest x-ray that patient had subcutaneous emphysema and pneumomediastinum. The patient was treated conservatively and discharged after a period of observation. CONCLUSION: Spontaneous pneumomediastinum is benign and seen primarily in young adults. It is more commonly associated with symptoms like chest pain and/or dyspnea, making an asymptomatic case particularly distinctive. The etiologies and precipitating factors are varied and often an apparent cause isn't identified. The diagnostic approach involves chest x-ray and/or computed tomography (CT) chest with further workup being largely unnecessary. The tenants of management include bedrest, analgesics, and supplemental oxygen as needed.